Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:34065 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752295Ab0BIEW2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:22:28 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:22:28 -0800 From: Sujith MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <19312.59210.947966.773343@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:10:42 +0530 To: Kalle Valo CC: Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless , Luis Rodriguez , "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: fix PAE frame handling In-Reply-To: <87d40ljov0.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> References: <4B65F735.1020509@openwrt.org> <19302.24837.154697.822430@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87d40ljov0.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kalle Valo wrote: > Any more information about the problem? For example, what APs are > broken? > > I'm just wondering if we should see this with other hardware also. Internal test cycles exposed this problem where certain APs didn't handle properly PAE frames being part of an aggregate. I'll see if I can dig up the APs from the test results. Sujith