Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:56995 "EHLO mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932683Ab0CLVUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:20:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:20:26 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Florian Mickler Cc: "John W. Linville" , Marcel Holtmann , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] enhance sysfs rfkill interface Message-ID: <20100312212025.GA17712@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1268416988-24862-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1268416988-24862-2-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1268416988-24862-3-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <20100312182209.GB8736@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100312215743.7671d173@schatten.dmk.lab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20100312215743.7671d173@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:57:43PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0800 > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:03:08PM +0100, florian@mickler.org wrote: > > > > > > +static ssize_t rfkill_hard_show(struct device *dev, > > > + struct device_attribute *attr, > > > + char *buf) > > > +{ > > > + struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > + u32 state; > > > + > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&rfkill->lock, flags); > > > + state = rfkill->state; > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags); > > > > Why exactly is this lock needed? > > The rfkill state is updated from multiple contexts... Am I overlooking > smth obvious here? > You are not updating but reading... Are you concerned about seeing a partial write to u32? It does not happen. -- Dmitry