Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57354 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758583Ab0CCAwV (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:52:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:52:20 -0500 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Sujith Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ath9k: Add common code to lib Message-ID: <20100303005220.GJ8069@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <19339.35501.467215.380773@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19340.54345.580466.373621@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19340.54345.580466.373621@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:33:05PM +0530, Sujith wrote: > John, > > Can you drop this series (7/7) ? > We had a bit of confusion regarding sharing code between > ath9k and ath9k_htc. And it has been decided to just use > ath9k_common.ko. > > Sorry for the trouble. Sujith, I myself am a bit confused with the patches which I should apply locally to get a clean history and move on with development on ath9k. Can I trouble you to repost a new series of patches required for ath9k_htc which does not add/use a lib.c and instead stuffs things into common from the start? If there are patches which are cosmetic, can you send them as a second series so that we are clear what stuff is 2.6.34-rc2 material or not? Luis