Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55118 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754679Ab0CCJGK (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 04:06:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:06:28 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20100303.010628.41962003.davem@davemloft.net> To: jpirko@redhat.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org, proski@gnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH] af_packet: move strict addr_len check right before dev_[mc/unicast]_[add/del] From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100303090512.GB2961@psychotron.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> References: <1267578048.14049.11.camel@mj> <20100303064001.GB2648@psychotron.redhat.com> <20100303090512.GB2961@psychotron.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Pirko Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:05:13 +0100 > Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:40:01AM CET, jpirko@redhat.com wrote: >>Subject: [net-2.6 PATCH] af_packet: move strict addr_len check right before dev_[mc/unicast]_[add/del] > > Dave please apply this against net-next-2.6. I see that 914c8ad2d18b is still not in > net-2.6. Would you relax? I just rebased net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 after Linus took in my changes and I just applied your regression fix to my tree and was about to let you know I applied it.