Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f198.google.com ([209.85.211.198]:47252 "EHLO mail-yw0-f198.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756619Ab0CIDKd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:10:33 -0500 Received: by ywh36 with SMTP id 36so678419ywh.4 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:10:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <43e72e891003081721h3db9ca53n4a3688ca8aa452a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100308025841.7460.69949.stgit@void> <201003090934.59740.br1@einfach.org> <43e72e891003081647r5cb0a286la5217ff1f97e0652@mail.gmail.com> <201003090950.21811.br1@einfach.org> <43e72e891003081721h3db9ca53n4a3688ca8aa452a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:10:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v2] ath5k: fix I/Q calibration (for real) From: Bob Copeland To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Bruno Randolf , ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote: >>> > as i said, in my point of view ath5k has several problems right now >>> > (performace and stability), and i guess nobody will be using it seriously >>> > in actual production use (does anyone?). Yes, people do use ath5k in production. Some large companies. >>> 2.6.32 will be used by a lot of "enterprise" releases, I'd prefer >>> connection stability fixes do indeed go in for 2.6.32 for ath5k >> sure, as i said, i don't mind. :) > > Alright lets skip stable for this. Wow this whole line of conversation is confusing :) If this fixes a calibration bug it needs to go to stable. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com