Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:60011 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756062Ab0CVWZi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:25:38 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Larry Finger Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ssb: Implement virtual SPROM on disk Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:25:35 +0100 Cc: Calvin Walton , John W Linville , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <4ba6aa45.z5Wso1NMth9eMeFG%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <1269239303.12836.17.camel@ayu> <4BA7E79C.9070100@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA7E79C.9070100@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201003222325.35994.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 22 March 2010 22:56:44 Larry Finger wrote: > Does anyone have any suggestions on what characteristic could be used to > generate a unique MAC address for a box in a udev rule? /dev/urandom Yeah, there's the chance of clashes. In practice there won't be any clashes, however. If you think there's a real risk, you should start playing the lottery tomorrow. You'll immediately win a million dollars so you don't have to worry about those questions anymore. ;) In fact, I think the risk for mac clashes is not really reduced by generating the mac address from serial numbers, whatever, etc... -- Greetings, Michael.