Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:39431 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758432Ab0CLUAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:00:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:57 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Florian Mickler Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI Message-ID: <20100312195257.GB17689@tuxdriver.com> References: <1268416988-24862-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <20100312191819.73ac4700@schatten.dmk.lab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20100312191819.73ac4700@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:18:19PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's > queued. > > This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and > "hard". > > I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and > blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel > wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it > suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware... Could you just submit a third patch that makes the requested name changes? Thanks! John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.