Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:49553 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757617Ab0DPNpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:45:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:37:11 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] ssb patches for SPROM location Message-ID: <20100416133711.GB8554@tuxdriver.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:20:51AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > John, I posted some time ago following patches: > > [RFT][PATCH] ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC > [PATCH 1/2] ssb: Use relative offsets for SPROM > [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Fix order of definitions and some text space indents > > while Michael has some doubts about "ssb: Look for SPROM at different > offset on higher rev CC" I explained to him that what he does not like > was fixed in next 2 posted patches. > > AFAIR you got some device with this recently-discovered location of > SPROM. Could you test my set if it makes your card working? If so, > could you take that patches to your tree? Sorry, been busy w/ other things. FWIW, my implementation based on the RE work from Larry did not work on the box in question, and my implementation wasn't substantially different from yours. Anyway, I'll try to confirm this soon w/ your patches and to collect more information for Larry. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.