Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:50733 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752676Ab0DVWNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so71837fgg.1 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:15:44 +0200 From: Richard Zidlicky To: Pavel Roskin Cc: Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rc80211_minstrel.c:70 WARNING with 2.6.34-rc4 Message-ID: <20100422221544.GA15879@linux-m68k.org> References: <20100418085653.GA7345@linux-m68k.org> <1271694855.9026.51.camel@mj> <20100419174100.GA5312@linux-m68k.org> <4BCC95CC.7030109@openwrt.org> <20100419175508.GB5312@linux-m68k.org> <4BCC9A27.9000104@openwrt.org> <1271972321.12589.2.camel@mj> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1271972321.12589.2.camel@mj> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:38:41PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:00 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > > can that happen when both ends are configured to a fixed rate of 11M? > > No idea. I've never used fixed-rate. I guess it could, if it uses 11M > > for communicating with a peer that it for some reason did not enable > > this rate for. > > I think if there is a legitimate condition when it can happen, we should > not be using WARN_ON. certainly there must be rate limitting before it hits any stable kernel. Richard