Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:42835 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753288Ab0DPGUw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:20:52 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so954066wwb.19 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:20:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:20:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH PING] ssb patches for SPROM location From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John, I posted some time ago following patches: [RFT][PATCH] ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC [PATCH 1/2] ssb: Use relative offsets for SPROM [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Fix order of definitions and some text space indents while Michael has some doubts about "ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC" I explained to him that what he does not like was fixed in next 2 posted patches. AFAIR you got some device with this recently-discovered location of SPROM. Could you test my set if it makes your card working? If so, could you take that patches to your tree? -- Rafał