Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]:4149 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758628Ab0EYVS4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 17:18:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4BFC3EBA.1090607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:18:50 +0200 From: Gertjan van Wingerde MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-05-25 References: <20100525170401.GE31753@tuxdriver.com> <4BFC331A.9030606@gmail.com> <20100525204235.GA27002@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20100525204235.GA27002@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/25/10 22:42, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: >> On 05/25/10 19:04, John W. Linville wrote: > >>> Gertjan van Wingerde (2): >>> rt2x00: Fix rt2800usb TX descriptor writing. >> >> The patch causing the breakage this patch fixes wasn't actually upstream yet. So, >> applying this patch only is now introducing a bug in 2.6.35. I guess it is better >> to revert this patch for 2.6.35. > > Hmmm...OK. Which patch introduces the bug this was intended to fix? > It's this one: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127374343617025&w=2 But that patch depends on a number of other unapplied patches :-(, namely: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127374940425538&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127374344617058&w=2 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127374343217011&w=2 --- Gertjan.