Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:45395 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755032Ab0ESBro (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 21:47:44 -0400 Received: by pwi5 with SMTP id 5so1287791pwi.19 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:47:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100519012528.22206.77550.stgit@tt-desk> References: <20100519012528.22206.77550.stgit@tt-desk> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:41:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] pending ath5k + antenna patches To: Bruno Randolf Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote: > These are all my pending ath5k patches + the antenna support for cfg80211 > rebased against 2.6.34 and based on the previous patch i sent for stable > ("ath5k: consistently use rx_bufsize for RX DMA"). No need to bunch these up together, in fact it would help the review process if instead you spit these up by series which are relevant to each other. The stable fix is one alone, the antenna stuff should be a separate series, then the other stuff if they are not related as a separate series. > Also i'd like to note that there are quite a few ath5k patches which haven't > made it into linux-next yet. It would be great to get them into 2.6.35... Unless its a fix, I think its too late. Luis