Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:58302 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758052Ab0ESNAM (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 09:00:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:59:42 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Bruno Randolf Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] pending ath5k + antenna patches Message-ID: <20100519125941.GA2412@tuxdriver.com> References: <20100519012528.22206.77550.stgit@tt-desk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20100519012528.22206.77550.stgit@tt-desk> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:30:39AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote: > Also i'd like to note that there are quite a few ath5k patches which haven't > made it into linux-next yet. It would be great to get them into 2.6.35... That probably won't happen. The exception would be for self-contained bug fixes. As for linux-next, Stephen usually asks not to merge anything into linux-next feeder trees during the merge window unless they are intended to go to the current release. So, non-bugfix patches probably won't be going to linux-next either for another week or so. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.