Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:61642 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041Ab0ESWUp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 18:20:45 -0400 Received: by pva18 with SMTP id 18so1199443pva.19 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100519172944.GB32757@tpkurt2.garloff.de> References: <20100519172944.GB32757@tpkurt2.garloff.de> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WLAN Regulatory Domain Germany To: Kurt Garloff , Michael Green , David Quan Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Kurt Garloff wrote: > Hi, > > studying the three documents > > WLAN 5GHz (Vfg. 7/2010) > http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/38216/publicationFile/6579/WLAN5GHzVfg7_2010_28042010pdf.pdf > > WLAN 2.4GHz (Vfg. 89/2003) > http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/38214/publicationFile/2557/FundstelleId313pdf.pdf > > Frequenznutzungsplan > http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/38448/publicationFile/2659/Frequenznutzungsplan2008_Id17448pdf.pdf > > I think the data in db.txt is slightly inaccurate. > > Find below my suggested entry into db.txt. > Suggested changes: > * Updated references (they restructured their webserver/CMS it seems) > * Split 5150 -- 5350 range into two >  - the first range does not require DFS > * 5470 -- 5725 does not have a NO-OUTDOOR requirement >  - (and 500mW translates to 27db, not 26db AFAICT) > > Sidenote: The values include lowering txpower by a factor of 2 (3db) >  for non TPC devices -- the wording in Vfg. 7/2010 does NOT require >  this for 5150 -- 5250; so we could actually use 200mW/23db there. As >  this is out of line with the neighbour countries, I have sticked with >  the conservative value of 100mW here. > > What is the process for checking the correctness and getting the crda DB > updated? > > 8<------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > # Data from "Frequenznutzungsplan" (as published in April 2008), downloaded from > # http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/38448/publicationFile/2659/Frequenznutzungsplan2008_Id17448pdf.pdf > # For the 5GHz range also see > # http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/38216/publicationFile/6579/WLAN5GHzVfg7_2010_28042010pdf.pdf > # The values have been reduced by a factor of 2 (3db) for non TPC devcies > # (in other words: devices with TPC can use twice the tx power of this table). > > country DE: >        # entries 279004 and 280006 >        (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) >        # entry 303005 >        (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR >        # entries 304002 and 305002 >        (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS >        # entries 308002, 309001 and 310003 >        (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS > > 8<------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > (Or in db, as displayed by iw reg get) > country DE: >        (2400 - 2483 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >        (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR >        (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS >        (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS > > PS: I'm not subscribed, please copy responses to me. Thanks for the e-mail and your review, I've passed this to our regulatory gods and it is now being picked at and reviewed. Luis