Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:54519 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748Ab0FAQWm (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:22:42 -0400 Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-05-28 From: reinette chatre To: "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" Cc: "John W. Linville" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Zheng, Jiajia" , "Kolekar, Abhijeet" , "Berg, Johannes" In-Reply-To: References: <20100528180952.GC2405@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:22:41 -0700 Message-ID: <1275409361.2091.27208.camel@rchatre-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sedat, On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 06:34 -0700, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Two people confirmed the patch in [2] fixes: > 1. iwlwifi-2.6 GIT master (commit f10a237c95abd6d64a3a24553bd1d3bcddd9108b) > 2. compat-wireless (2010-05-21) > > And it fixes also the above mentionned combination. We are working on getting this patch upstream. The version tested contains a significant amount of duplicated code as well as some cleanup code mixed in. It is thus not appropriate for an upstream submission at this time. > As a suggestion: > What about "copying" bug-reports (incl. its history) from IWL-BTS into > linux-wireless ML? > For example (dri-devel related) bug-reports from > bugzilla.freedesktop.org are "copied" into dri-devel ML. Pointing people to the bug report seems to work ok. What benefit does the above have? Reinette