Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35228 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757700Ab0FURMH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:12:07 -0400 Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so663910wwb.19 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C1172BD0B6D@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> References: <1274856569-13436-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <20100618184257.GB6282@tuxdriver.com> <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C1172BD0B6D@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:12:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL - And general point regarding tx power limits in the dbase From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: Michael Green Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , David Quan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 17:51, Michael Green wrote: > Here are my comments on the proposed patch... > > country IL: >> > ? ? ? (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> > + ? ? (5150 - 5250 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR >> > + ? ? (5250 - 5350 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > > b) I think all entries in the dbase should be in dBm (not mW). ? dBm vs. mW are absolutely equivalent. No reason to retain "mW" unit from the source docs. ?I think this was agreed by all before, but wanted to reiterate. Can you please help me translation from mW to db ? Thanks