Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:37615 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932805Ab0FBU3t convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:29:49 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:29:49 -0700 From: Michael Green To: Emmanuel Grumbach , "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:29:47 -0700 Subject: ] wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL Message-ID: <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C1117C4605E@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> References: <1274856569-13436-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <4825B8A2C4E264489E57869F0DCFB22343E33E611F@hasmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com> <4825B8A2C4E264489E57869F0DCFB22343E33E6133@hasmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi All, I agree it's okay to enable HT40 in 5GHz for Israel. I suggest the 2010 doc from Emmanuel be reference in the dbase so implementers are aware of the conditions by MOC for enabling HT20/HT40 in both bands during regulatory conformance of the product in Israel. Michael Green Atheros Communications, Inc. mgreen@atheros.com Desk: +1-781-400-1491 Mobile: +1-508-380-4921 -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Grumbach [mailto:egrumbach@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:47 PM To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: Grumbach, Emmanuel; linville@tuxdriver.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Michael Green; David Quan Subject: Re: [RFC] wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL > wrote: > >>On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Grumbach, Emmanuel > >> wrote: > >>>>> ?country IL: > >>>>> ? ? ? ?(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > >>>>> + ? ? ? (5150 - 5250 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > >>>>> + ? ? ? (5250 - 5350 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > >>>> > >>>>I believe the one standing issue here is you are enabling HT40 on 5 > >>>>GHz, how about enabling 2.4 GHz first, and then through a separate > >>>>patch and time/review we review the HT40 stuff, unless you are in no > >>>>rush to get 2.4 GHz enabled. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am not following... HT40 on 2.4 GHz is already enabled... > >>> What should I enable in 2.4 GHz ? > >> > >>Sorry I meant 5 GHz. > > > > Actually 40GHz is less a problem in 5GHz than in 2.4GHz since in 2.4GHz > > I need to have a "Coexistence mechanism", which is not required in 5GHz. > > This Coexistence mechanism is apparently implemented by one OEM under the > > name "Clear Channel Assessment (CCA)". > > > > In short, I don't think there is any special issue with 40MHz in 5GHz, but > > I may miss something here... In any case, I have no problem with sending > > a patch that allows 5GHz in 20MHz for the moment. > > I can also have a look at the EEPROM in our NICs which is supposed to have > > all the needed limitations. Details to follow tomorrow. > > OK thanks for the clarification Emmanuel, please give Michael some > time to review. > How much time ? :-)