Return-path: Received: from mail.tpi.com ([70.99.223.143]:2077 "EHLO mail.tpi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977Ab0FVTgn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:36:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4C2110BA.3020801@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:36:26 -0600 From: Tim Gardner Reply-To: tim.gardner@canonical.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: Pavel Roskin , linux-wireless , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , j@w1.fi Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 References: <1277157673.24550.5.camel@mj> <4C200059.1090100@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/21/2010 06:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tim Gardner wrote: >> On 06/21/2010 04:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111 >>>>>> Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0 >>>>>> Submitter : Petr Pisar >>>>>> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old) >>>>> >>>>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this... >>>> >>>> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner: >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/ >>>> >>>> The patch is applied to wireless-testing >>>> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46) >>>> >>>> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46 >>>> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f >>>> >>>> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to >>>> 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected. >>> >>> Tim can this be sent for stable? >>> >>> Luis, a stable whore >>> >> >> Luis, >> >> The patch that I sent John is already Cc stable@kernel.org, though it may >> not now apply after 56bf882230d2266a2e07b7f404dc96d157a65daa 'Revert >> "wireless: hostap, fix oops due to early probing interrupt"'. I'll check in >> the morning and craft a backported patch if necessary. > > Sweet thanks for the heads up! > > Luis > Hmm, looks like I'm gonna have to write some backport patches. I'll wait until this appears in Linus' tree so I can feed stable the right SHA1 info. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com