Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:51640 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756078Ab0FAUJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:09:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Association problems - again - comment From: Johannes Berg To: Jaroslav Fojtik Cc: Bob Copeland , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4C055FA2.23990.223BFA@jafojtik.seznam.cz> References: <4C02E1CA.10757.239262@jafojtik.seznam.cz> , <4C055FA2.23990.223BFA@jafojtik.seznam.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:09:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1275422985.3634.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 21:29 +0200, Jaroslav Fojtik wrote: > Dear Bob, > > I have found a solution for my problem. > > Patch from "Johannes Berg " fixes a problem. > > #Processing an association response could take a bit > #of time while we set up the hardware etc. During that > #time, the AP might already send a blockack request. That makes no sense at all -- ath5k doesn't do aggregation. I guess it probably just means that your problem is timing related. johannes