Return-path: Received: from server.heaven-czfree.net ([78.108.102.201]:48955 "EHLO smtp.heaven-czfree.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753580Ab0FAUeY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:34:24 -0400 From: "Jaroslav Fojtik" To: Johannes Berg , Bob Copeland , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:24:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Association problems - again - comment Message-ID: <4C056C8D.28708.54B184@jafojtik.seznam.cz> In-reply-to: <1275422985.3634.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <4C02E1CA.10757.239262@jafojtik.seznam.cz>, <4C055FA2.23990.223BFA@jafojtik.seznam.cz>, <1275422985.3634.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dear Johannes Berg, > > I have found a solution for my problem. > > > > Patch from "Johannes Berg " fixes a problem. > > > > #Processing an association response could take a bit > > #of time while we set up the hardware etc. During that > > #time, the AP might already send a blockack request. > > That makes no sense at all -- ath5k doesn't do aggregation. I guess it > probably just means that your problem is timing related. But it works ;) May be, I do not know ATH5k internals. I could test something, when you generate some release. Anyway, the "workable" code still has reverted patch: > You said you reverted 6b5d117eddc09cd976ad8030d715f4 and still have the > problem, right? Are you sure you booted the kernel with the revert? So 2 changes against "compat-wireless-2010-05-30" has been done. regards Jara