Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:64776 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933594Ab0FRPFj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:05:39 -0400 Received: by pvg6 with SMTP id 6so493594pvg.19 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C1B8B69.3060503@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:06:17 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: Leann Ogasawara , flamingice@sourmilk.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ben Collins Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54usb: Remove duplicate Medion MD40900 device id References: <1276208913.1221.3646.camel@emiko> <4C1173E7.6010201@lwfinger.net> <20100614185549.GB2216@tuxdriver.com> <1276624745.6127.61.camel@emiko> <20100615194610.GB2415@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20100615194610.GB2415@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2010 02:46 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:59:05AM -0700, Leann Ogasawara wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:55 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >>> So, I guess you are concerned about the groupings because of the >>> different firmwares or something like that? Perhaps a comment that >>> says "this could be a version 2 device" is just as handy? Since the >>> driver prints the name of the firmware it wants, is there any real >>> need for grouping the IDs? >>> >>> OTOH, is there any actual harm from the duplicate entry? It "seems" >>> wrong to me too, but I guess it does no harm...? >> >> I don't believe there is any harm from the duplicate entry, it just >> seemed unnecessary. >> >>> Leann and/or Ben, was this just tidying-up? I'm guessing there wasn't >>> an actual bug involved? >> >> Indeed, this was just a patch we'd been carrying to tidy things up. >> There was no actual bug involved. I'd be happy to send a v2 of the >> patch which comments out the duplicate entry and adds a note as to why. >> Or I'd be fine just leaving the code as is and we'll drop the patch >> we're carrying locally in Ubuntu. > > FWIW, I like the 'comment-out and add a note' option. I'm a little late here after being offline, but I too like the comment out option. Larry