Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:44587 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753350Ab0GPROc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:14:32 -0400 Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7so879158pvc.19 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:14:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C403859.70201@openwrt.org> References: <4C403859.70201@openwrt.org> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:14:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: what's the status of ATHEROS_AR71XX config variable? To: Felix Fietkau Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, Gabor Juhos , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2010-07-16 10:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >>   from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/Makefile: >> >> ath9k-$(CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR71XX) += ahb.o >> >> but there is no such config variable.  so i'm thinking *something* >> should be removed. > The platform port for AR71xx hasn't been submitted upstream yet. But the > code in ahb.c is actively being used in OpenWrt. > > I don't know what the status on submitting the code to linux-mips is, > but I've Cc'd Gabor, he should know ;) If its actively being supporting and tested, why not submit it now? Any particular large pending blockers? Luis