Return-path: Received: from flokli.de ([78.46.104.9]:51663 "EHLO asterix.flokli.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755004Ab0GPXs6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:48:58 -0400 To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" Subject: Re: commit 062bee448bd539580ef9f64efe50fdfe04eeb103 broke my iwlagn 5100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:48:56 +0200 From: Florian Klink Cc: Johannes Berg , , Florian Klink In-Reply-To: <1279324150.8881.12.camel@wwguy-huron> References: <1279324150.8881.12.camel@wwguy-huron> Message-ID: <1832d27ef0bdc5631b4765838c8445a7@imap.flokli.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:49:10 -0700, "Guy, Wey-Yi" wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 16:22 -0700, Florian Klink wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:44:21 -0700, "Guy, Wey-Yi" >> wrote: >> > Hi Florian, >> > >> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:36 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote: >> >> > Johannes, >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:36 -0700, Florian Klink wrote: >> >> > > Hi, >> >> > > >> >> > > I did a dmesg with 2.6.35-rc5 and debug=0x43fff. >> >> > > You can get it here: http://pastebin.com/Q6eCdPZR >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > based on the log sent by Florian, I did not see bss_info_change with >> >> > current BSSID from mac80211. any thought? >> >> > >> >> > I am expected to see something like this, >> >> > >> >> > [165796.572969] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed changes = >> >> > 0xFD >> >> > [165796.572972] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed BSSID >> >> > 00:25:9c:d0:9f:e1 >> >> > [165796.572976] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed ERP_PREAMBLE 1 >> >> >> >> That'd only happen _after_ association, not before, and assoc fails >> >> here. >> >> >> > Could you try different channel instead of channel 12 to see if the >> > problem still there? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Wey >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> very strange, now I can't reproduce the problem anymore, association >> works with channel 12 and other ones, too! >> I have no idea why it's now working... >> >> Could this commit affect any link tolerance/timeouts, because I was >> able to bisect the problem? >> > Not sure what happen, but please do let us know if you see the problem > pop up again. I do not think this patch should affect the link > tolerance. > > Thanks > Wey >> Hi, okay, but thanks for your time anyway... :-) Florian