Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:54184 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751928Ab0GVW4q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:56:46 -0400 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so3143209ewy.19 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:56:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C4791AF.8040909@openwrt.org> References: <4C4791AF.8040909@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: performance regressions / tx semi-stuck somehow From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Smedman?= To: Felix Fietkau Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2010/7/22 Felix Fietkau : > On 2010-07-22 12:17 AM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just tried out compat-wireless-2010-07-16 on AR913x (with >> openwrt/trunk@r22321) and saw some weird performance problems. >> > Could you please try if the earlier version that was in OpenWrt > (2010-07-06) has the same issues? > Quickly flashing the builds I have on hand I came up with this small table comparing MacBook 11g and 11n clients for various openwrt/trunk versions: r21960P (compat-wireless-2010-06-15): 11g = 12Mbps, 11n = 7.2Mbps r22286 (compat-wireless-2010-07-06): 11g = 7.2Mbps*, 11n = 4.2Mbps* r22321 (compat-wireless-2010-07-16): 11g = 12Mbps*, 11n = 2.9Mbps* (*) Bursty / unstable performance. (P) Some patches of my own on top of openwrt. I realize it doesn't say very much unfortunately... /Bj?rn