Return-path: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:47619 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754171Ab0GMMue (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:50:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4C3C6106.3000909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:50:14 +0200 From: Stefan Richter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alejandro_Riveira_Fern=E1ndez?= CC: Martin Steigerwald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap (was Re: stable? quality assurance?) References: <201007110918.42120.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <201007111651.42963.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20100713131112.26a3da54@varda> In-Reply-To: <20100713131112.26a3da54@varda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote: > I for one stopped booting into -rc kernels. > The fact that still have to patch my kernels with a *one* liner > since 2.6.29 kernel [1] does not give me confidence on the "test > report/bisect and it will be fixed" promise some have made in this > threath > > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 There were promises made in this thread? Then I must have read a different mailinglist or so. I do not know why your WLAN regression has not been fixed yet, but at least it seems rather plausible why commit 7e0986c17f695952ce5d61ed793ce048ba90a661 is not going to be reverted (if such a revert is the one-liner that you are referring to). Why is one reporter's rt2500 OK now though but not yours? Are there different card revisions or firmwares out there that require quirk handling? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- -=== -==-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/