Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:42772 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751524Ab0HOURX (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:17:23 -0400 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so1622819pvg.19 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C684B41.7060709@lwfinger.net> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:17:05 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dimitri.gorokhovik@free.fr CC: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIFN0ZWZhbmlr?= , linville@tuxdriver.com, stefano brivio , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: b43: is there such a thing as radio 0x2062 rev 2? References: <1123777895.142301281900112563.JavaMail.root@zimbra3-e1.priv.proxad.net> In-Reply-To: <1123777895.142301281900112563.JavaMail.root@zimbra3-e1.priv.proxad.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/15/2010 02:21 PM, dimitri.gorokhovik@free.fr wrote: > > ----- "Gábor Stefanik" a écrit : > >> Does the card actually work if you make b43 believe that it has a >> BCM2063 radio? > The interface stays on (the WiFi LED lit), and I can scan and see > the networks (Quality info seems OK as well with 2.6.35). However, > I am still unable to connect to either an open or a protected > network: > > Aug 15 19:04:11 dimitri kernel: wlan0: authenticate with 00:17:33:1e:13:70 (try 1) > Aug 15 19:04:11 dimitri kernel: wlan0: authenticated > Aug 15 19:04:11 dimitri kernel: wlan0: associate with 00:17:33:1e:13:70 (try 1) > Aug 15 19:04:11 dimitri kernel: wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:17:33:1e:13:70 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) > Aug 15 19:04:11 dimitri kernel: wlan0: associated > Aug 15 19:04:16 dimitri kernel: No probe response from AP 00:17:33:1e:13:70 after 500ms, disconnecting. > >> BTW, all BCM2062 radios seen so far are rev.2, and none have shown >> this error. Maybe your card actually has a BCM2063 radio, but for >> some reason b43 detects it as a BCM2062? > Sure, this is of course possible (I don't really believe my patch > fixes the problem). The MAC address of the WiFi card is > 00:22:68:ba:e2:ef (maybe somebody knows know the manufacturing > series). > > For the record, I was able, only once, to run the unmodified driver > (2.6.32 x86+_64 debian kernel), but was never able to get it ever > again after that. That time, the HDMI res negotiated on both my > screens (though a dock) was rather unusual (something like > 11xx X 9xx) so I think my problem might be some sort of CEM > problem. > >> >> Also, does the Broadcom hybrid driver handle your card? > Last time I tried (more than a year ago), from memory, I believe, > I was able to scan, but I had the problems with Network Manager > support and didn't go for manual config. >From a quick look at the latest Broadcom driver that we have for RE, for PHY rev <= 2, there are times when a 2063 radio is treated as a 2062, but there are others where it is a 2063. When I get time, I'll try to sort it out and update the specs. In the meantime, NACK on the patch. It is certainly incomplete, and does not appear to help. Larry