Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:53813 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867Ab0HYIJ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:09:26 -0400 Subject: Re: Marshaling issues w/ compat-wireless-2010-08-19 From: Johannes Berg To: Philip Prindeville Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen In-Reply-To: <4C746F74.70401@redfish-solutions.com> References: <4C746F74.70401@redfish-solutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:11:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1282723861.3685.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:18 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > (1) "Unknown event 5" messages when starting up hostapd (line 95 > below): That's fine, it's just EVENT_INTERFACE_STATUS. > (2) Some highly unlikely values from the hostapd debugging messages > when parsing out WEP authentication messages (line 507): > > This is captured in http://pastebin.ca/1924659 : > > authentication: STA=f8:1e:df:1e:c2:23 auth_alg=35510 auth_transaction=79 status_code=21688 wep=1 > Unsupported authentication algorithm (35510) > > > I'm wondering if some messages that are passed up to user-space via > netlink from the driver might have changed their schema, i.e. adding > new fields in the middle of a structure or moving fields around within > a structure. Looks more like a crypto problem to me, as this should be the encrypted challenge in your shared key handshake. IOW, it looks like the frame isn't getting decrypted by mac80211 for some reason. johannes