Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:41546 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204Ab0H0Pzs (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:55:48 -0400 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so1126625pvg.19 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:55:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1282924294.4377.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1282887527-23259-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <20100827090655.GA15873@jm.kir.nu> <1282923444.4377.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1282923799.4377.14.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1282924294.4377.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:55:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFT] mac80211: fix broadcast/multicast data drop on scan To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jouni Malinen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo , Amod Bodas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:48 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > Well, there's no way we can reliably wake up exactly before a beacon by >> > implementing that in software, hard real-time hasn't been achieved in >> > Linux yet :-) >> >> Keyword here is *exactly*. I don't want to wake up *exactly* at DTIM, >> only ensure we don't sleep during it and the send buffered frames and >> multicast traffic data. Why can we not implement this on mac80211? > > Well, how long before the beacon do you want to wake up to catch it? > 1ms? 10ms? 100ms? 1000ms? What if the system is busy? I cannot say what would work best, how about half a beacon interval early? Luis