Return-path: Received: from mail.redfish-solutions.com ([66.232.79.143]:59533 "EHLO mail.redfish-solutions.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756506Ab0HaBID (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:08:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7C55E6.1060707@redfish-solutions.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:07:50 -0700 From: Philip Prindeville MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jouni Malinen CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg Subject: Re: Marshaling issues w/ compat-wireless-2010-08-19 References: <4C746F74.70401@redfish-solutions.com> <20100828171239.GA23885@jm.kir.nu> <4C79450C.80507@redfish-solutions.com> In-Reply-To: <4C79450C.80507@redfish-solutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 8/28/10 10:19 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 8/28/10 11:12 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:18:44PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> I've got a stock Fedora Core 13 install (updated today) with the hostapd-0.6.10 rpm and hostapd-0.7.2 compiled from sources. The NIC is a Ubiquiti SR71e (AR9280). >>> (2) Some highly unlikely values from the hostapd debugging messages when parsing out WEP authentication messages (line 507): >>> authentication: STA=f8:1e:df:1e:c2:23 auth_alg=35510 auth_transaction=79 status_code=21688 wep=1 >>> Unsupported authentication algorithm (35510) >> I was unable to reproduce this with the current development tree >> snapshots. Shared key authentication worked with AR9280 and the current >> wireless-testing.git and hostap.git in my tests. If you are still seeing >> this, you could also try to disable hw crypto to remove one possible >> issue area by using nohwcrypt=1 module parameter when loading ath9k. >> > > Already tried that, and it didn't help. > > -Philip I also tried with the tarballs from 2010-07-19, and 2010-08-29 and saw the same issue. I also was able to reproduce the issue with "nohwcrypt=1". So I'm wondering what if decryption is working fine, but the buffer has an alignment issue or isn't being marshaled into netlink properly? -Philip