Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:43809 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752551Ab0IOOYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:24:36 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: mac80211/ath9k: allow scanning single channel if other VIF is associated. From: Johannes Berg To: Ben Greear Cc: Jouni Malinen , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <4C90D683.7000801@candelatech.com> References: <4C8EB03D.7070808@candelatech.com> <20100915030316.GB30253@jm.kir.nu> <4C9059DC.7060009@candelatech.com> <1284545796.3842.11.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4C90D683.7000801@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:24:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1284560664.7705.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 07:21 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Right, but as soon as one finished, the next would start, and at least in .31, > that caused the first to un-associate, giving never-ending loop of interfaces > scanning and trying to associate. There should be a grace period maybe? > Ok, I'll see if I can add a 'scan-one-if-associated' flag for wpa-supplicant to > use. Just make it give the channel instead of adding new API. johannes