Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:34690 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754575Ab0IPS7j (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:59:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:45:57 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jouni Malinen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Filter ProbeReq SuppRates based on TX rate mask Message-ID: <20100916184557.GD7221@tuxdriver.com> References: <20100828163610.GA23426@jm.kir.nu> <1283154490.3691.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1283154490.3691.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:48:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 19:36 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > If the TX rate set has been masked, the removed rates can also be > > removed from the Supported Rates and Extended Supported Rates IEs in > > Probe Request frames. > > Technically, the probe request frame indicates RX bitrates. I don't > really mind using the TX bitrates as well since typically I do think you > probably want them to be symmetric, but shouldn't that come with nl80211 > updates etc. since that's all saying TX_BITRATES? Ping? -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.