Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:48002 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756618Ab0IWUbh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:31:37 -0400 Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so1700332iwn.19 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:31:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <718868.40588.qm@web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <718868.40588.qm@web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:31:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Compiling carl9170 To: Walter Goldens Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Tim Gardner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Walter Goldens wrote: > >> Yes, distributions should pick carl9170 over ar9170 though >> as ar9170 >> will be removed from the kernel after a good kernel try out >> of it. >> >>   Luis > > Sounds logical. Shouldn't ar9170 be disabled by default via config.mk > in compat-wireless to prevent collision with carl9170 before its completely removed? Sure. Luis