Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:52280 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752771Ab0IXTLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:11:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:11:39 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Luciano Coelho Cc: "ext John W. Linville" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Ido Yariv , Ohad Ben-Cohen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] omap: beagle: add support for wl1271 on the board file Message-ID: <20100924191139.GI4211@atomide.com> References: <1285236215-21136-1-git-send-email-luciano.coelho@nokia.com> <20100924180316.GE8077@tuxdriver.com> <1285354249.9779.3.camel@powerslave> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1285354249.9779.3.camel@powerslave> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Luciano Coelho [100924 11:42]: > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 20:03 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:03:35PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > > Add board configuration for the wl1271 daughter board. This patch is based > > > on Ohad Ben-Cohen's patches for Zoom boards. > > > > > > Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen > > > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho > > > --- > > > from v2 to v3: removed accidental change to wl1271.h > > > > I presume that this should come through my tree as well (since it > > contains the move of wl12xx.h)? > > Yes, this is based on your tree. But please hold on, because there were > some comments (namely, the expansion board should be detected, not > configured for wl1271 by default), which I still have to fix. I'm > waiting for the manufacturer of the expansion board to provide me with > some more info for proper detection. > > Also, I know that there are some other work being done in the beagle > board file, so we may need to rethink how to sync this. > > So, for now, let's skip this patch and I'll provide another one when > these issues are addressed. You could also do it based on some kernel cmdline option. Of course detection during the runtime would be better. Regards, Tony