Return-path: Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:40330 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932730Ab0I0GOC (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:14:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:58 +0200 From: Florian Mickler To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "Chatre, Reinette" , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , "Berg, Johannes" , Zhu Yi , "Cahill, Ben M" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted Message-ID: <20100927081358.07b30327@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: <1285357868.12594.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> References: <1285345323-4250-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1285357868.12594.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:51:08 -0700 "Guy, Wey-Yi" wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Thanks for sending the patch, the scan operation in iwlwifi just being > modified and the changes you have no longer apply.please check the > latest kernel. > > Thanks > Wey > Ok, I checked out git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-2.6.git and it definitely looks better in there. This patch shouldn't be necessary for that. Do you plan on submitting this for 2.6.36 or .37? I think my patch should fix the instance reported in the bug in a less invasive manner. Only remaining question is why it did only show up now. But that's probably due to the workqueue changes. Regards, Flo