Return-path: Received: from mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp ([220.111.41.203]:39138 "HELO mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752482Ab0IGAzY (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:55:24 -0400 Received: from vs3002.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (125.206.180.165) by mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 0-031856522 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:48:43 +0900 (JST) From: Bruno Randolf To: Fabio Rossi Subject: Re: ath5k calibration error Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:48:29 +0900 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <201009070110.11495.rossi.f@inwind.it> In-Reply-To: <201009070110.11495.rossi.f@inwind.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201009070948.29066.br1@einfach.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue September 7 2010 08:10:11 Fabio Rossi wrote: > In the patch 9e04a7eb1fdf37bc8bc0d0f59e5fb737926f0152 there has been a > change in the possible return values from ath5k_hw_rf511x_iq_calibrate(). > > Sometimes I get -1 (before that commit the return value was always 0) > because i_coffd:0, q_coffd:0 and the following error message is produced: > > ath5k phy0: calibration of channel 8 failed > > Of course I'm running on channel 8. > > Is this condition normal or something is weird? I have the following card: > > 3Com Corporation AR5212 802.11abg NIC (3CRDAG675) (rev 01) > > Thanks, > Fabio hmm, i guess i was wrong to introduce the -1 return value here, since this is not really an error condition... sorry, bruno