Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from p3plsmtpa01-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.82.81]:43947
	"HELO p3plsmtpa01-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755168Ab0I0ODp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:03:45 -0400
Message-ID: <15713CDD627C41D39E4B9725AE2B241D@ChuckPC>
From: "Chuck Crisler" <ccrisler@vgocom.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: active vs. passive scans
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:03:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

How to you get the supplicant/linux wireless to perform active scans rather 
than passive scans? Are active scans faster?

Thank you,
Chuck