Return-path: Received: from nbd.name ([88.198.39.176]:49995 "EHLO ds10.nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754735Ab0JIPYG (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:24:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB0890D.3050208@openwrt.org> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:23:57 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Smedman?= CC: "John W. Linville" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net" , linux-wireless Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: Insert wmb before linking dma descriptors References: <20101005131744.GB4074@tuxdriver.com> <20101005195039.GD11831@tux> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2010-10-09 5:19 PM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > wrote: >> Felix is more familiar with this area so I'll let him chime with >> his ACK/NACK. >> >> Luis > > So Felix, what do you think? I realize it may not be a common problem > on any currently popular platform, but don't you agree it is in > principle unsafe to write to the ds_link field of dma descriptors > without a guarantee that those writes will be performed in the > intended order? Haven't had time to review this in detail yet. I'll take another look at it later... - Felix