Return-path: Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]:23678 "EHLO mgw-sa02.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653Ab0JEMHT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:07:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap: zoom2/3: fix build caused by wl1271 support From: Luciano Coelho To: ext Tony Lindgren , "John W. Linville" Cc: Anand Gadiyar , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Ohad Ben-Cohen In-Reply-To: <1286279588.15401.28.camel@chilepepper> References: <1285965206-17777-1-git-send-email-gadiyar@ti.com> <20101001231026.GH3117@atomide.com> <1286279588.15401.28.camel@chilepepper> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:07:06 +0300 Message-ID: <1286280426.15401.29.camel@chilepepper> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]: > > > Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the > > > wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info. > > > .wires has now been replaced with .caps in patch "omap: mmc: > > > extended to pass host capabilities from board file" in the > > > OMAP tree. > > > > > > This causes linux-next as of 20101001 build to break as > > > below. Fix this. > > > > > > CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.o > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c:217: error: unknown field 'wires' specified in initializer > > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.o] Error 1 > > > make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2 > > > > Can you guys please queue this via the wireless tree along with > > the other wl1271 patches? > > > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren > > I can apply this to the wl12xx tree. I just need John's confirmation. > > The pull request I sent to John last week is still pending. I don't > know if it is possible to substitute it for a newer one with more > patches (and still try to make it to 2.6.37). What do you think, John? Damn, for some reason I had a bug in John's email in my contact book. Now sending to the correct email address. -- Cheers, Luca.