Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.19.149.2]:56891 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752158Ab0JDRZG (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:25:06 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:24:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:25:04 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Johannes Berg CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Jouni Malinen , Paul Stewart , Amod Bodas , Vasanth Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mac80211: fix rate_control_send_low warnings for delbas Message-ID: <20101004172504.GL2105@tux> References: <1285965233-11097-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1286198845.3620.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20101004164149.GE2105@tux> <1286210566.3620.42.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1286210566.3620.42.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:42:46AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 09:41 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:27:25AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > How about this instead of your patches 2 and 3? > > > > > > We're disassociating from the old AP since we associate with the new AP, > > > so there's not a whole lot of sense in explicitly tearing down > > > aggregation sessions either, right? > > > > Good question, but why do we not get a warning when transmitting > > the disassoc frame? > > We aren't transmitting a disassoc frame! OK, then the question is if we should even at least do that... Luis