Return-path: Received: from mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp ([220.111.41.203]:37145 "HELO mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756124Ab0JFCuv (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:50:51 -0400 Received: from vs3017.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (125.206.180.250) by mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 2-0456603450 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:50:50 +0900 (JST) From: Bruno Randolf To: Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ath5k: Add busy ratios to survey data Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:50:52 +0900 Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , vasanth@atheros.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20101005095510.3083.46174.stgit@tt-desk> <201010061125.54247.br1@einfach.org> <4CABE2DA.5020204@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <4CABE2DA.5020204@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201010061150.52352.br1@einfach.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed October 6 2010 11:45:46 Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2010-10-06 4:25 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote: > > On Wed October 6 2010 07:38:34 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> This is all being sucked out of common, so can we just share the > >> filler for the survey between ath5k and ath9k? Note we should split up > >> hw code and core driver code on the ath module by file. > > > > sure, that would be good! noise floor comes from ath5k_hw though, but > > that can easily be moved to common. > > > > there's so much code which could be shared between ath5k and ath9k... > > That would need sharing of the channel list and some per-channel data > though - so it may need some more code reshuffling... also - we would need a common way to get ath_common from ieee80211_hw, which works for both ath5k and ath9k. right now each has it's own structures. so... i'd say: later... bruno