Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:54887 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753337Ab0JVV51 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:57:27 -0400 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so832256gxk.19 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:57:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CC2043D.2040909@lwfinger.net> References: <1287779045-20257-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <4CC2043D.2040909@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:57:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: rfkill: use status register based on core revision not (PHY's) From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 22 października 2010 23:38 użytkownik Larry Finger napisał: > On 10/22/2010 03:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki >> --- >> This makes my N-PHY radio at least running (no scanning results so far). The >> same register is used by wl on this device. >> --- >>  drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c |    2 +- >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c >> index 78016ae..d2734c9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ >>  /* Returns TRUE, if the radio is enabled in hardware. */ >>  bool b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(struct b43_wldev *dev) >>  { >> -     if (dev->phy.rev >= 3 || dev->phy.type == B43_PHYTYPE_LP) { >> +     if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) { >>               if (!(b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI) >>                     & B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI_MASK)) >>                       return > > As that register is present only when the core revision >= 3, this change should > not cause a regression. Perhaps this was an error in the RE from the start and > testing the phy.rev has always been wrong. Do not blame RE team ;) It was described correctly since "ever", you can check it in history of: http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/MMIO I actually suspect this may be source of self-switching-on-off-radio issue described in: "b43legacy-phy3: Radio hardware status changed to XXX" thread. I already mailed reporter to ask if he still has access to problematic card. -- Rafał