Return-path: Received: from mail30t.wh2.ocn.ne.jp ([125.206.180.136]:3755 "HELO mail30t.wh2.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753104Ab0JVAaB (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:30:01 -0400 Received: from vs3000.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (125.206.180.163) by mail30t.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 3-0371427397 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:29:58 +0900 (JST) From: Bruno Randolf To: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ath9k: fix RX poison issue Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:30:01 +0900 Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1287616028-12547-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <4CC07CA9.4040808@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <4CC07CA9.4040808@candelatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201010220930.01071.br1@einfach.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri October 22 2010 02:47:21 Ben Greear wrote: > I tested this code when it was combined into a single patch. > There were still some issues, but I have no reason to believe > this patch set caused them. This patch set significantly > improved stability in my testing with 130+ STA interfaces. one question: do you see similar issues with ath5k? i remember one bug is filed with a rx poision issue. thanks, bruno