Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:35095 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754205Ab0JHSA4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:00:56 -0400 Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1527278wwj.1 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:00:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101008174128.GC946034@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> References: <20101008111221.5425.qmail@stuge.se> <4CAF4B70.9050001@candelatech.com> <20101008165232.GI10149@tux> <4CAF4FDA.8060908@candelatech.com> <1286557944.3612.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4CAF53E2.8030306@candelatech.com> <20101008174128.GC946034@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> From: David Willmore Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:00:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] trying to set tx power (using txpower option) To: David Lamparter Cc: Ben Greear , Johannes Berg , ath9k , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, David Lamparter wrote: > d-B-m is deci-Bel-milliWatt, so a mBm ostensibly is a > milli-Bel-milliWatt... > > (yes, the "m" really encodes "mW"...) The value is a "Power", so the base unit of Watts is implicit. This particular unit has always confused the heck out of me. It's *not* milli-Bel-milliWatt or the division would be by 1000, so it's really centi-Bel-milliWatt, no? Cheers, David