Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.19.149.2]:52217 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754622Ab0JDQlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:41:51 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:41:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:41:49 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Johannes Berg CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Jouni Malinen , Paul Stewart , Amod Bodas , Vasanth Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mac80211: fix rate_control_send_low warnings for delbas Message-ID: <20101004164149.GE2105@tux> References: <1285965233-11097-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1286198845.3620.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1286198845.3620.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:27:25AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > How about this instead of your patches 2 and 3? > > We're disassociating from the old AP since we associate with the new AP, > so there's not a whole lot of sense in explicitly tearing down > aggregation sessions either, right? Good question, but why do we not get a warning when transmitting the disassoc frame? The race is hit when we are on the wrong channel, are you sure we are not sending a disassoc on a wrong channel? I would expect a smoother transition if we actually disassoc fromt the old AP in the ESS and I am not sure if we do that right now. Luis