Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:40306 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752493Ab0KZVKB (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:10:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF02226.2030403@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:58 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hostap@lists.shmoo.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] supplicant: Enable sharing of scan results. References: <1289950756-18452-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <20101126205002.GA4302@jm.kir.nu> In-Reply-To: <20101126205002.GA4302@jm.kir.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/26/2010 12:50 PM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 03:39:16PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: >> When using multiple VIFs on the same physical radio, >> we can share scan results with sibling interfaces. >> This decreases time it takes to connect many VIFs. > > Thanks! This looks reasonable. I did some cleanup and applied it. > > Based on a quick test, this seemed to be able to connect over 100 > station vifs using WPA2-Personal to a single AP without major problems. > Some resources are running out (just CPU?) that makes some of the 4-way > handshakes fail (timeout?), but after couple of tries, I got 116 of > 124 stations connected. This is with all interfaces starting at the > same time; using some more latency there would likely make this quite a > bit more robust. > > wpa_supplicant seemed to stop trying to reconnect in some cases, so this > probably triggered some bugs that need to be addressed. Anyway, manual > "wpa_cli -i reassociate" on the missing eight vifs was able to > get all the 124 stations connected at the same time. Excellent! Was this an ath5k or ath9k NIC (or something else?) Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com