Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([147.243.128.24]:62667 "EHLO mgw-da01.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545Ab0KHJQU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 04:16:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] wl1271: Change wl12xx Files Names From: Luciano Coelho To: ext Kalle Valo Cc: ext =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Stefanik , ext Grazvydas Ignotas , Shahar Levi , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <87oca1zbt0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <1288883257-30060-1-git-send-email-shahar_levi@ti.com> <1288891196.17643.6.camel@powerslave> <1288907555.17643.14.camel@powerslave> <87oca1zbt0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:16:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1289207768.8423.15.camel@chilepepper> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:07 +0100, ext Kalle Valo wrote: > Luciano Coelho writes: > > >> What about wl1251 vs. wl12agn (or wl12bgn if no .11a support), like iwlwifi? > > > > Hmmm... wl1251 supports bg. wl12xx supports abgn. I don't really see > > the logic in this? What difference does it make comparing to calling it > > wl12xx? From wl12agn the user still doesn't know whether wl1251 is > > supported or not. > > Just to confuse even more: TI wl1253 (the chip) supports 11a and it > would be easy to add wl1253 (the chip) support to wl1251 (the driver). > I just haven't seen any linux devices using wl1253 yet. Oh, I didn't even know that wl1253 even existed. :) But yeah, it complicates things even more indeed. -- Cheers, Luca.