Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:50166 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751689Ab0K2V3o (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:29:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:27:08 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003 Message-ID: <20101129212707.GG8199@tuxdriver.com> References: <1290279018-29716-1-git-send-email-nbd@openwrt.org> <20101122201511.GG2117@tuxdriver.com> <4CEAD7FA.1060107@openwrt.org> <20101129195038.GD8199@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:19:19PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, John W. Linville > wrote: > > After being chided for having an excessive number of patches in -next > > with "Cc: stable@kernel.org", I would prefer to avoid (or strongly > > limit) merging such patches that way. > > Is this a bad thing? The point was that if it was a fix worth of consideration for stable then it generally ought to be worth of consideration for the current release. > Come to think of it we didn't get OTP patches in for 2.6.36 so I am > not considering we should just disable AR9003 from the PCI ID list for > ath9k as all cards sold should have it so in that case this patch > would just need to go to 2.6.37 and not 2.6.36. Do you perhaps mean "need to go to 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37"? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.