Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:32881 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752580Ab0KEJ45 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:56:57 -0400
Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2175365fxm.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] rt2x00: Wait up to one second on rt2800 for WPDMA to be ready
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:56:03 +0100
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <201011042037.00178.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <201011051044.37167.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> <AANLkTinDwi_77iVS-bOTSX_4zs76nyttoEsdfpV0_F2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinDwi_77iVS-bOTSX_4zs76nyttoEsdfpV0_F2g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <201011051056.03700.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Am Freitag 05 November 2010 schrieb Ivo Van Doorn:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Helmut Schaa
> <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag 04 November 2010 schrieb Ivo van Doorn:
> >> From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
> >>
> >> At least some devices need such a long time to inititalize WPDMA. This
> >> only increases the maximum wait time and shouldn't affect devices that
> >> have been working before.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Joshua Smith <jesmith@kaon.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Ivo, the patch context looks different then in the version I've send to you.
> >
> > The
> >        for (i = 0; i < REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT; i++) {
> > should be
> >        for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> >
> > Otherwise we don't wait up to one second as in the comment but just 50ms :P
> >
> > However, that change was part of a previous patch that was already merged into
> > the rt2x00 git tree. Seems like that change got lost during the merge ...
> 
> I'll try to find the patch which changed the REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT behavior.

I'm not sure but I guess I haven't sent that one as separate [PATCH] but it
was inlined in the mail traffic with Joshua ("Question about starting up an
AP").

> I'm almost worried that more patches have somehow gotten lost (I already noticed
> that there were a bunch of patches which were send upstream had disappeared
> from rt2x00.git, but those fortunately reappeared during the last
> update from wireless-testing).

I haven't noticed any other missing patches till now.

> Ivo
> 
> Ivo

So, you finally decided to clone yourself?

Thanks,
Helmut