Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:61016 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482Ab0KARMg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:12:36 -0400 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so3344154gxk.19 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CCEF06B.5030708@openwrt.org> References: <8762whrqvm.fsf@gmail.com> <4CCEF06B.5030708@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:12:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: race conditions in dma From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Smedman?= To: Felix Fietkau Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Ben Gamari , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2010/11/1 Felix Fietkau > > My TX PCU patches for ath9k are not merged yet, try those or wait > > until John merges them. > They are merged in OpenWrt. Bj?rn, which OpenWrt revision did you use in > your tests? > > - Felix I'm based on openwrt/trunk@23720 when I run code. But when I read code I'm looking at the latest wireless-testing (and trying to keep track of pending patches on linux-wireless). I will apply the TX PCU patch and see if that changes my bad fuzzy feeling. /Bj?rn