Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:64684 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757944Ab0KOQhG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:37:06 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so4584836wyb.19 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:37:04 -0800 (PST) From: Florian Fainelli To: Wojciech Dubowik Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ath5k: AHB port. Add AHB bus support. Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:37:13 +0100 Cc: Bob Copeland , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau References: <9968918.321289836178712.JavaMail.wlan@CHBU500181> In-Reply-To: <9968918.321289836178712.JavaMail.wlan@CHBU500181> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201011151737.13737.florian@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 15 November 2010 16:49:47 Wojciech Dubowik wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:16:06PM +0100, Wojciech Dubowik wrote: > > > What about such changes compared to original patch? It's then > > > > possible to > > > > > compile both modules at the same time. Of course linking won't work > > > > because > > > > > I would need to separate functions like in ath9k. > > > > Is there a plan to add a config entry for ATHEROS_AR231X (or did > > I miss it?) Someone will one day run their Kconfig checker and > > report it missing. > > Openwrt has whole implementation but I have no idea why it's not > in the official kernel. > > Actually the same applies to ath9k because ATHEROS_AR71XX definition > needed for AHB is not specified in latest kernel. > http://www.mail-archive.com/ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org/msg03660.html Support for Atheros AR71xx chips has been submitted for review a couple of days ago: http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2010-11/msg00085.html the Kconfig symbol name should be changed accordingly when the patches are accepted. > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/Kconfig > > > @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ > > > > > > config ATH5K > > > > > > tristate "Atheros 5xxx wireless cards support" > > > > > > - depends on PCI && MAC80211 > > > + depends on (PCI || ATHEROS_AR231X) && MAC80211 > > > > > > select MAC80211_LEDS > > > select LEDS_CLASS > > > select NEW_LEDS > > > > > > + select ATH5K_AHB if ATHEROS_AR231X > > > + select ATH5K_PCI if PCI > > > > I like this better, but there probably needs to be a mutual > > exclusion so that randconfig builds don't break. Then you don't > > get to build both still, but the resulting Makefile is a bit more > > normal. And then if someone shows up saying that they really do > > have some AR231X device with PCI, then it's more obvious what they > > need to do to fix it (i.e. separate bus interfaces from core). > > > > Something like? > > select ATH5K_PCI if (PCI && !ATHEROS_AR231X) > > or > > depends on ((PCI && !ATHEROS_AR231X) || (!PCI && ATHEROS_AR231X)) ... > > I will make it exclusive and post in the the series if there are > no more comments. > > Wojtek > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html